Skip to content

In Texas, choosing not to carry workers’ compensation changes what you can argue in court

Texas does not require most private employers to carry workers’ compensation, although important exceptions apply — including certain private employers performing work under government contracts. Section 406.002(a) of the Texas Labor Code provides that, except for public employers and as otherwise provided by law, an employer may elect to obtain workers’ compensation insurance coverage.

What that section gives, Section 406.033(a) takes back. In an action by an employee of a non-subscriber, it is not a defense that the employee was contributorily negligent, that the employee assumed the risk of injury, or that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee. All three classic defenses are removed at once.

For a plant with presses, CNC cells, forklifts and conveyors, that is the highest-stakes decision on this page. A manufacturer that opts out is not simply self-funding medical costs — it is accepting tort exposure with its three principal defenses already gone. Section 406.005 separately requires an employer to notify each employee whether or not it carries coverage.

This describes the statutory framework. Whether non-subscription is right for a specific employer is a legal and financial decision that belongs to counsel and to the employer’s own analysis.

Elsewhere in this ecosystem: Manufacturing · Resource Center · Operations · Coverage · Industry 4.0 · Glossary

For how these duties land on one specific operation, see precision machining, where guarding and energy control sit alongside the conformance records that answer a downstream defect claim.

Where manufacturing risk is actually controlled

Machine guarding

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) requires one or more methods of guarding to protect operators from hazards created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips and sparks. Subsection (a)(3)(ii) adds that the point of operation must be guarded so as to prevent the operator from having any part of the body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.

Control of hazardous energy

29 CFR 1910.147 covers servicing and maintenance where unexpected energization, start-up or release of stored energy could injure someone. It requires a program of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections — and under (c)(4)(i) the procedures must be developed and documented.

Powered industrial trucks

29 CFR 1910.178(l) requires the employer to ensure each operator is competent, demonstrated by completing the specified training and evaluation — and (l)(4)(iii) requires a performance evaluation of each operator at least once every three years.

Documentation is the evidence

Written energy control procedures, guarding assessments, operator evaluations, maintenance records and quality records are not paperwork. Documentation may influence underwriting, defensibility and claim substantiation. It is not coverage, and it does not create coverage — but the plant that can produce written energy control procedures, guarding assessments, operator evaluations and maintenance records is a materially different risk from the plant that cannot.

Related material that is live now

Workers' compensation

The canonical page for how the coverage works, experience modification and claim handling. This cluster covers the manufacturing application.

Coverage cluster

How a machinery loss moves through property, equipment breakdown, business income and dependent property at the same time.

Operations

Where each operation assumes responsibility in the product lifecycle, and what that means for process hazard.

Bring the loss runs and the safety documentation together

Loss history explains what happened. Documented procedures explain whether it happens again. Underwriters price the second one.